As outlined in my introductory post last week, water is a critical resource that is needed to facilitate agricultural production. However, there are significant environmental challenges facing African nations (and the rest of the world) in sustainably meeting its food and water needs, with 4 billion people globally facing severe water scarcity for at least a month each year (Mekonnen, 2016). As many countries see rapid urbanisation and a resulting increased, concentrated demand for food supplies, intensive irrigated agriculture is often seen as a necessary alternative to small-scale subsistence farming. This post will explore the environmental challenges and opportunities in sustainable agriculture through the lens of Dr. Mesfin Mekonnen's work on sustainable agriculture in Kenya.
 |
Figure 1: Irrigated farmland in Nigeria showing intensification of agriculture Source: The Business Post
|
With access to only 9% of global freshwater resources (Gaye, 2018), Africa, and particularly Sub-Saharan Africa arguably faces the most quantitative water scarcity. However, the exploitation of groundwater resources has provided the opportunity for widespread adequate provision of clean drinking and agricultural water, given the right infrastructure and sustainable management strategies. In particular, 'Groundwater use for irrigation is forecast to increase substantially to combat growing food insecurity on the continent' (Gaye, 2018), exemplified by Figure 1, where irrigation agriculture is being massively intensified in Nigeria in response to growing population and food demands. As a result, it is important to understand the environmental challenges posed by increased water and food demands on the 'Water footprint' of Africa.
For example, Mekonnen's study of the cut-flower industry in Kenya showed that whilst the growth of export agriculture has supported economic development, the damaging environmental implications involved, such as freshwater pollution and decreases in biodiversity, must be addressed through sustainable management practices. Whilst this is not strictly about food security, the solution proposed of a 'water sustainability agreement between major agents' could use market mechanisms to assist in sustainable water resource management practices. whilst still supporting efforts to meet food security needs. The agreement would contain added product premiums for retailers to account for the environmental costs of production, which would then be redirected towards funding sustainable management efforts
(Mekonnen, 2012) This shows the potential for innovative market-based solutions to integrated resource management issues.
 |
Figure 2: The implied virtual water costs of various food products in Litres Source: Science Media Centre |
Another market-based response to water scarcity is through the use of 'virtual water'. Virtual water refers to the water resource costs of manufactured goods or crops produced. For example, it takes 4510 litres of water to produce a t-shirt (
Hossain, 2020),
and a massive 2400 litres to produce a hamburger, as shown by Figure 2. An application of this concept in market-based solutions would be to import water-intensive products to reduce the resource burden on national producers (Mekonnen, 2014).
However, there are many political issues facing national governments in sustainably meeting their food and security needs, such as economic development goals superseding environmental concerns, as well as resource management practices entrenching socio-economic inequalities in access to water (
Mehta et al., 2016). Future posts will try to critically assess some of these contested approaches to water and food resource management.
Wow, very insightful information about virtual water, Do you know of any specific companies who use this??
ReplyDeleteHi Bejna! I think that the concept of virtual water is really important for any country operating in a low CWU (consumptive water use) area, essentially where water is scarce. This is because water-intensive products can be imported to avoid increasing localised water insecurity. (https://agupubs-onlinelibrary-wiley-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/toc/19447973/45/5). I think that whilst this is more relevant to governments than companies, a specific example of this is Saudia Arabia *ignoring* the concept and importing live cattle rather than beef products (https://www.thecattlesite.com/news/54339/), which could have very damaging consequences for their long-term water security!
DeleteReally nice use of figures to support your pointes. I really like your thoughts on the notion of the "water footprint"- maybe this could be expanded further in a post later on? I think there is a lot that could be said here when considering virtual water?
ReplyDeleteGreat stuff on virtual water, if I can suggest a book - check out 'When the Rivers Run Dry', it was one of the first Geography books I ever read, has always stuck with me as one of the most interesting. From what I remember it has some really good stuff about virtual water, the numbers for some of the items like a hamburger is insane!
ReplyDeleteThank you for the recommendation Manny, I'll check it out in the IOE library this week! It's true that some of the virtual water figures are really shocking, I remember seeing the figures for beef production (15,000 litres for a kg!) in a GCSE/ A level class at school that really stuck with me.
DeleteHi Eric, I really like you putting figure 2 to explicitly show the amount of virtual water needed for daily products.
ReplyDeleteAn interesting solution proposed, Do you think its applicable to the wider Africa or perhaps it is limited by some factors (population, education, GDP and etc.). The figures used are clear and very informative, would be better if you can make them bigger.
ReplyDelete